Cheesecake Labs’ LF Decentralized Trust Development Services: Expertise in Besu and Hyperledger Fabric
Cheesecake Labs | May 30, 2025
Cryptocurrency wallets are foundational tools in the growing world of digital finance. Choosing the right wallet model — custodial or non-custodial — is crucial for businesses planning to integrate crypto transactions or launch blockchain-based solutions.
Each has distinct implications for security, regulatory compliance, user experience, and control over digital assets.
In this guide, we’ll explore the differences, highlight each type of wallet’s advantages and risks, share relevant industry trends, and look at real-world examples to help businesses like yours decide on the best type of wallet to develop.
A crypto wallet is a digital tool that stores your private and public keys, enabling you to send, receive, and manage cryptocurrencies on blockchain networks.
While it doesn’t hold crypto directly, it reflects your balance and activity, much like a bank account.
There are two primary wallet categories: custodial wallets and non-custodial wallets.
A custodial wallet is a type of digital wallet where a user or a third party, typically an exchange or regulated financial institution, manages and stores private keys on behalf of the user.
This model simplifies access and recovery but shifts control away from the user..
Advantages | Challenges |
---|---|
User-friendly: Easy onboarding and intuitive interface. Integrated services: Built-in trading, buying, and fiat conversion. Regulatory compliance: Easier adherence to KYC/AML regulations. | Users don’t directly control their private keys. Centralized security risks are vulnerable to breaches (e.g., Mt. Gox, Bitfinex hacks). Potential downtime and limited access during service outages. |
Custodial wallets are ideal for startups, fintech platforms, and regulated institutions that prioritize convenience, compliance, and streamlined user experiences.
A non-custodial wallet, also known as a self-custodial wallet, gives users full control over their private keys, eliminating reliance on third-party providers.
The keys are stored securely on the user’s own device, ensuring true ownership of digital assets.
Benefits | Challenges |
---|---|
Full control over digital assets: Direct access to blockchain transactions. Enhanced security: Eliminates third-party risk of hacks. Greater privacy: No mandatory identity verification. Compatible with DeFi and Web3 services. | Higher responsibility: Losing keys means irreversible loss of funds. Often requires technical understanding or careful UX design. |
Non-custodial wallets are ideal for blockchain-based apps, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, and fintech startups seeking to offer self-custody and true financial autonomy.
Here’s a quick cheat sheet to help you tell the difference between custodian and non-custodial wallets.
Feature | Custodial wallet | Non-custodial wallet |
---|---|---|
Private key control | Third party or user | User-controlled |
Security risk | Risk of hacking, but recoverable | Higher security, but loss of keys is irreversible |
User experience | Beginner-friendly | Managing private keys may be challenging for non-technical users |
Privacy | Subject to tracking and regulations | Anonymous transactions possible |
DeFi & Web3 access | Compatible, depending on the features of the wallet | Compatible, depending on the features of the wallet |
Choosing between a custodial and a non-custodial wallet depends on your business model and technical priorities.
The table below helps startups, fintech platforms, blockchain-native apps, and enterprises evaluate whether custodial or non-custodial wallets are the better fit, based on compliance, scalability, asset control, and blockchain interoperability.
Startups & fintech platforms | Blockchain-native & DeFi platforms | Enterprises & global payment providers |
---|---|---|
Choose custodial wallets if your business prioritizes compliance, ease of integration, and scalability for regulated markets. | Opt for non-custodial wallets if your solution demands full asset control, decentralization, and direct blockchain interoperability. | Consider adopting innovative non-custodial models (like MoneyGram’s solution) that blend self-custody security with traditional financial usability and compliance measures. |
If you’re considering building a crypto wallet, it’s essential to look beyond core features and consider both security and regulatory compliance.
The requirements differ significantly between custodial and non-custodial models, each carrying distinct risks and responsibilities. Overlooking these factors can lead to security breaches or compliance violations.
In the sections below, we break down the most common risks associated with each type of wallet and explore strategies to mitigate them effectively.
Custodial wallets have been frequent targets of cyberattacks due to the centralized storage of private keys. This centralized model has led to some of the most high-profile security breaches in crypto history.
Below are key incidents that highlight the inherent risks of custodial wallet solutions.
Non-custodial wallets offer stronger asset control and security, but they also come with technical and usability challenges.
From key management to onboarding complexity, here are the key trade-offs to consider.
With non-custodial wallets, users maintain control of their keys, providing better security and control. However, that also leaves users open to potentially irreversible losses if those keys are lost or compromised.
As global regulators tighten oversight, both custodial and non-custodial wallets face increasing scrutiny, but the impact varies based on how the wallet is structured.
Custodial wallets, in particular, are often classified as Money Services Businesses (MSBs) under U.S. law.
This classification requires registration with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and adherence to strict compliance protocols.
Meanwhile, non-custodial wallets generally fall outside FinCEN’s MSB designation, as they don’t hold or transmit user funds.
However, this could change as regulators increasingly examine decentralized technologies that still offer UI layers or added services.
To stay compliant as the landscape shifts, businesses operating or developing wallet solutions should actively track:
A standout example of successfully navigating the technical and regulatory challenges of non-custodial wallets is MoneyGram’s non-custodial wallet, designed and developed by Cheesecake Labs.
Built on the Stellar Network, the solution delivers enterprise-grade security, decentralization, and user-centric features that make non-custodial wallets truly accessible.
MoneyGram’s success proves that non-custodial wallets can be secure, scalable, and compliant, unlocking new opportunities for financial innovation on a global scale.
As blockchain adoption grows, wallet technology is quickly evolving. Businesses developing wallets today need to anticipate tomorrow’s user expectations and regulatory realities.
Here are some of the biggest trends shaping the next generations of crypto wallets:
Traditional finance companies like Visa and PayPal are investing in enterprise-grade custodial solutions tailored towards banks, hedge funds, and payment providers.
These solutions prioritize compliance, insurance, and integration with existing financial systems.
Machine learning is enhancing fraud detection and threat monitoring in both wallet types.
Advanced systems now monitor for unusual login patterns, transaction behaviors, and bot activity — all in real time.
Wallets are moving toward passwordless authentication via device biometrics, facial recognition, or passkeys — improving security and simplifying access for mainstream users.
Seamless decentralized finance (DeFi) access is becoming a key differentiator in wallet UX. Non-custodial wallets now offer direct access to DeFi features like:
The choice between custodial and non-custodial wallets depends on your business model, regulatory context, and user expectations.
As the industry evolves, innovative solutions, such as enhanced recovery mechanisms, AI-powered security, and seamless DeFi integrations, will continue shaping the market.
If your company is ready to build a scalable and secure crypto wallet solution, Cheesecake Labs can help.
With proven experience in blockchain development services — including the successful MoneyGram Wallet project — our team specializes in crafting custom solutions tailored specifically to your business goals.
Custodial wallets are managed by third parties (or users) that store your private keys, providing convenience but less control.
Non-custodial wallets give users full control and responsibility over their private keys, enhancing security and decentralization.
Non-custodial wallets offer greater overall security since only the owner has access to the private keys. However, custodial wallets might be more suitable if users lack the capability or willingness to securely manage keys.
Typically, no. Losing private keys usually means losing your funds permanently. However, innovative standards like Stellar’s SEP-30 multi-signature recovery now offer safer, user-friendly recovery options.
Yes. Custodial wallets must adhere to Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations, making them suitable for enterprises and regulated fintech platforms.
Custodial wallets usually work best for startups and fintech apps due to their ease of integration, compliance-friendly infrastructure, and simplified user experience.
Generally limited. Custodial wallets can support basic crypto trading but have limited direct interaction with DeFi and Web3 ecosystems. Non-custodial wallets are more compatible with DeFi.
Bruno Nascimento is a Staff Engineer specializing in Web3 technologies and blockchain solutions at Cheesecake Labs, driving transformative innovation across decentralized ecosystems. With proven expertise in enterprise-scale blockchain implementations, Bruno worked on projects with Stellar Development, MoneyGram's non-custodial crypto wallet, and co-created the Certified Besu Professional exam for LF Decentralized Trust and Linux Foundation, establishing industry-leading certification standards for Ethereum client proficiency.